Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajit Bapu Satam Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017–18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajit Bapu Satam Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Held that cash withdrawn by the assessee from the bank was much more than the amount deposited due to demonetization. Further, there is no findings by the authorities that this cash available with the assessee was invested or utilised for any other purpose. Hence, addition u/s 69A unsustainable Facts- Assessee made cash deposits of Rs. 20 Lakhs in his bank account during the demonetization period. AO treated the said cash deposits as unexplained money and added the same to the total income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act. CIT(A) also dismissed the appea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930