#Section 69A
Log in to FollowLatest Section 69A updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Addition u/s. 69 not sustained since source of investment explained: ITAT Ahmedabad

PAN Linking Error by bank Leads to Addition: ITAT Directs reconsideration

Belated appeal before CIT(A) dismissed without an opportunity of being heard not justified

Ex-parte order confirming addition of entire cash deposits during demonetization not justified

Addition u/s. 69A to extent of redeposit of cash withdrawn untenable: ITAT Bangalore

Addition u/s. 69A sustained since assessee remained non-compliant: ITAT Ahmedabad

ITAT Orders Reassessment of ₹10.3 Lakh Deposit After Appeal Dismissal

Addition u/s. 69A quashed as nature and source of deposit clearly established: ITAT Nagpur

Cost imposed on assessee for negligence in diligently prosecuting appeal before CIT(A): ITAT Ahmedabad

Source of capital investment explained hence addition u/s. 68 not sustained: ITAT Visakhapatnam

Non-admission of additional evidence by CIT(A) untenable: Matter remanded

Dismissal of appeal due to non-prosecution without adjudicating matter on merits unjustified: ITAT Ahmedabad

Addition u/s. 68 remanded back with direction to file all documents explaining source of cash deposits

Dismissal of appeal merely because appeal was filed manually instead of e-filing unjustified: ITAT Ahmedabad
Explore the latest Section 69A updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
