#Section 148
Log in to FollowLatest Section 148 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Period of limitation prescribed under Income-tax Act, 1961

Share Premium Can’t Be Taxed U/s 68 Merely Because AO Finds It Excessive: Mumbai ITAT

Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Finding of Failure to Disclose Material Facts: ITAT Delhi

AO cannot introduce a new addition while giving effect to appellate order: ITAT Chennai

ITAT Deletes Investment Addition as Bank Records Proved Source of Funds Despite Non-Production of Mother

Delhi HC questions Denial of Prepaid Tax Credit Solely Because Return Was Filed After Section 148 Notice

Income Tax Reopening Quashed as PAN Was Not Properly Transferred to Jurisdictional Officer

Pre-1 Oct 2009 Share Gifts Not Taxable Under Section 56(2)(vii)(c): ITAT Mumbai

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Reasons Recorded for Section 148 Notice Were Unsigned

ITAT Deletes FTS Addition Because India-UAE DTAA Contains No FTS Clause

Bogus Purchase Addition Can’t Be 100% When Sales Are Accepted: ITAT Mumbai

ITAT deleted ₹90 Lakh on-money addition based on unsigned property agreement and unauthenticated search material

ITAT Deletes section 69 Addition as Revenue Failed to Prove Investment in Relevant Year

No Interest Disallowance Without Nexus Between Borrowed Funds & Non-Business Advances: ITAT Lucknow
Explore the latest Section 148 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
