Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : The article explains how the Finance Acts, 2025 and 2026 have reshaped the Updated Return regime under Section 139(8A). It highlig...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has remitted reassessment cases for fresh consideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 147A, leavi...
Income Tax : This article explains why reassessment proceedings may be invalid if the Assessing Officer merely relies on Investigation Wing rep...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Where unaccounted sales were established through seized material, only the net profit embedded therein was liable to tax, and not ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore remanded a Section 69A addition after holding that an APMC commission agent's entire sale proceeds could not be tre...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
ITAT Mumbai quashes a ₹1.12 Cr. reassessment, ruling it void due to being issued against a dissolved company, an unsigned order, and for the wrong assessment year.
ITAT Raipur followed Supreme Court and Delhi High Court precedents, including ACIT vs Hotel Blue Moon and Shaily Juneja vs ACIT, ruling that reassessment without service of Section 143(2) notice is arbitrary, bad in law, and void
ITAT Jaipur rules reassessment notice issued post-TOLA limit invalid in Sanskriti Build-Dev vs ITO. Proceedings declared time-barred under Rajeev Bansal ruling.
ITAT Jaipur deletes ₹6.26 Cr. addition u/s 68, stating it would be double taxation. Tribunal also rules that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by remanding the case for verification of already submitted documents.
ITAT Chennai invalidates reassessment under Section 148 as notice issued by Jurisdictional AO post 29.03.2022 violated faceless procedure.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has invalidated the reassessment against Sunidhi Securities & Finance Limited, citing an incorrect sanctioning authority for the Section 148 notice. The case centered on a reassessment initiated for alleged bogus trading losses, which the Tribunal deemed null and void based on the judicial precedent set by the Supreme Court.
The Rajasthan High Court, citing prior judgments, invalidated a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act because it was issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer.
ITAT Delhi rules a reassessment void, holding that the Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period, citing Supreme Court and High Court precedents.
ITAT Delhi deletes a Rs.3.60 crore addition to income, ruling that unrealized interest cannot be taxed and that a fraudulent TDS return does not constitute actual income.
ITAT Delhi partly allows assessee’s appeal, holding Rs.70.46 lakh addition for Kolkata property wrongly made in wife’s hands; entire investment made and disclosed by husband.
