#section 143(3)
Log in to FollowLatest section 143(3) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Amount received as consequence of divorce cannot be held as unexplained cash credit u/s 68

Mere proving identity of creditor is insufficient, genuineness of transaction is also to be proved

There cannot be second round of Section 271(1)(b) penalty for same default

Income generated cannot be held bogus only based on modus operandi

Benefit of deduction of 7.5% of total income available to co-operative banks u/s. 36(1)(viia)

Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education would fall under definition of ‘state’ as per Article 12

Addition of sales reversal entry as unexplained expenditure is unjustified

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustained as concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars not proved

Disallowance u/s. 14A of Income Tax Act cannot exceed exempt income

Third party statement recorded u/s 132(4) not an incriminating document for addition u/s 153A

Notional interest not taxable as bank statement doesn’t show credit of any interest

Manual final assessment order without containing DIN is unsustainable in law

Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) unjustified as investments made out of interest free funds

Reassessment proceedings unsustainable as full and true material facts provided
Explore the latest section 143(3) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
