Case Law Details
Tvl. Transtonelstory Afcons – Joint Venture Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court)
Introduction: The Madras High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Tvl. Transtonelstory Afcons – Joint Venture vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT). The court addressed two notices issued to the petitioner challenging TDS deductions for the assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. The petitioner, involved in the design and construction of underground stations, contested the jurisdiction of the notices. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, exploring the background, legal provisions, arguments presented, and the court’s findings.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background: The petitioner, engaged in contracts for the design and construction of underground stations, faced challenges from the first respondent concerning TDS deductions. The notices, issued in 2020, were based on audit findings, focusing on the assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.
2. Contract Details and TDS Liability: The petitioner had been awarded contracts (UAA-01 and UAA-05) with specific amounts and corresponding TDS payable. The petitioner applied for Form S, aiming to claim the Deemed Sale Value of the contract and exemption from tax payment. The complex nature of the contracts and TDS obligations formed the crux of the legal dispute.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
