Corporate Law : Understand the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970. Learn about its applicability, exemptions, registration, and co...
Corporate Law : Learn about various types of leaves in India, laws governing leave policies, and benefits of implementing a comprehensive leave po...
Corporate Law : Delve into the Code on Wages, 2019, amalgamating laws related to wages in India. Understand its objectives, features, judicial ins...
Corporate Law : Learn about payroll compliance, its importance, regulations governing payroll, and the benefits of adhering to payroll laws in Ind...
Corporate Law : Understand the essentials of an Employment Agreement with key components and a template. Learn about terms, obligations, and legal...
Corporate Law : Easy steps to file EPF/EPS nomination digitally Submit EPF/EPS Nomination Digitally! Steps to submit EPF/EPS Nomination Digitally:...
Corporate Law : As per the information gathered by me from news/media/notifications etc on new 4 Labour uniform codes few provisions are being imp...
Corporate Law : OFFICE OF THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER LABOUR DEPARTMENT, GNCT OF DELHI 5 – SHAM NATH MARG DELHI- 110054 Public Notice All Shops and ...
Corporate Law : Draft Rules relating to Employee’s Compensation under Code on Social Security, 2020 notified Ministry of Labour and Employment, ...
Corporate Law : Department of Social Justice and Empowerment has formulated the scheme of National Action Plan for Senior Citizens (NAPSrC) with e...
Corporate Law : Explore the Kerala High Court ruling in Latha vs. T V Sahadevan case, stating that independent contractors are not considered empl...
Corporate Law : Commanding Officer Vs Bhavnaben Dinshbhai Bhabhor & Others (Supreme Court of India) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, ...
Corporate Law : Detailed analysis of Gannon Dunkerley vs. Zillion Infraprojects case verdict by Delhi High Court. Contractor's payment denial to s...
Corporate Law : Moser Baer Karamchari Union Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) By way of this writ petition under Article 32 of the Consti...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that the annual increment to a government servant which he has earned for the services he has rendered over a s...
Corporate Law : Learn about the Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Amendment Act 2024, raising contribution rates to Rs 25 per employee and thrice fo...
Corporate Law : EPFO constituted committees for drafting schemes under Social Security Code 2020. This article provides details of committees and ...
Corporate Law : Effecting certain provisions of the Code on Social Security, 2020 in respect of Employees’ Provident Funds & Miscellaneous P...
Corporate Law : The establishment M/s Radhika Theatre, situated at Warangal, Telangana was covered under ESI Act w.e.f. 16.01.1981 on the basis of...
Corporate Law : The Online portal of Delhi Labour Welfare Board offering following services is hosted on URL https://dlabourwelfareboard.delhi.gov...
The Hon’ble High Court observed that Conciliation Officer is not an Industrial Tribunal or a Labour Court and does not exercise judicial/quasi-judicial functions and/or does not adjudicate the claims of /disputes between the parties.
It was further pointed out by the petitioner that the respondent – workman cannot be termed as workman within the meaning of Section 2(S) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.
Delhi High Court addresses compliance issues in the case of Ansal Properties & Neelam Bhutani. Key points on Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the court’s decision.
Whether forfeiture of gratuity, under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, is automatic on dismissal from service, is issue for consideration in this case.
A plain reading of the definition of Section 2(22) of the ESI Act makes it amply clear that wages means all remuneration paid or payable in cash to an employee, if the terms of the contract of the employment, expressed or implied, were fulfilled and includes other additional remuneration, if any, paid at intervals not exceeding two months.
Kerala High Court held that interim relief granted to the workers at 20% of the wages of the works will come within the purview of the definition of basic wages as mentioned in Section 2(b) of the the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
The Honble High Court observed that in terms of Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, a challenge to the order of a Commissioner can be made only on a substantial question of law. The present case was totally factual in nature and no substantial question of law took place.
Ensure compliance with labour laws and regulations in India with our comprehensive checklist. Stay updated and protect your business and employees.
Delhi HC upheld the compensation awarded under Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 by Commissioner and have upheld that a person whose employment is of a casual nature and is employed other than for the purposes of the employer’s trade or business comes within the meaning of employee as defined in Section 2(1)(dd) of Employees Compensation Act.
In present matter, the Honble Supreme Court observed that once the order of termination was approved by the Industrial Tribunal on appreciation of evidence led before it, thereafter the findings recorded by the Industrial Tribunal were binding between the parties and no contrary view could have been taken by the Labour Court contrary to the findings recorded by the Industrial Tribunal.
