ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted Section 270A penalty, holding addition under Section 43CA deeming provisions did not establish under-reporting...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai upheld deletion of Section 14A and Section 115JB additions, holding no exempt income was earned during the relevant as...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 153C and Section 143(3) assessments, holding absence of incriminating material and incorrect statutory ...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur deleted a Section 68 addition, holding that genuine share transactions cannot be treated as bogus without evidence lin...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored bad debt, TDS/VAT disallowance, Section 80G and Section 270A issues for fresh verification by the Assessin...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
DCIT Vs Meridian Chem Bond Private Limited (ITAT Pune) Does Proving the Three Main Ingredients by Assessee U/S 68 Shift the Burden of Proof On AO? Assessee is a company that duly files its return of income. The Revenue carried a search in case of another group concern & it was discovered that it was […]
ITAT Bangalore sets aside ex-parte order against senior citizen, ruling that email-only notices denied a fair hearing. Case remanded for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Kolkata rules on Islampur C.S. Shop 2 vs ITO, addressing cash deposits during demonetization and Section 69A addition. Read the tribunal’s key findings.
Penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice during the Covid-19 pandemic was deleted due to disruptions caused by lockdowns during outbreak of Covid-19 Pandemic and the Supreme Court’s extension of limitation periods.
Since CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal without addressing key issues raised against the assessment order, therefore, the matter was remanded back to CIT(A) as CIT(A) should have examined this issue by reviewing the assessment records.
ITAT Delhi affirms PCIT’s order under Section 263, ruling AO’s assessment erroneous & prejudicial to revenue. Key precedents cited include Ghanshyam HUF & Sham Lal Narula.
ACIT vs Prashant Prakash Nilawar case where ITAT Mumbai dismissed Rs. 17 Cr addition based on WhatsApp messages without concrete evidence. Understand judicial precedents cited.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses ITO’s appeal against Sun Gold Capital Ltd due to low tax effect under CBDT Circular 09/2024. Key issues include Section 148 and cash credits.
Analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in Rakesh Saxena Vs PCIT. The tribunal upheld the revision order, treating VRS benefits as taxable salary. Read the case summary.
ITAT Pune dismisses revenue appeal, upholding CIT(A)’s decision that a tax reassessment based on a cancelled PAN was invalid.
