ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted Section 270A penalty, holding addition under Section 43CA deeming provisions did not establish under-reporting...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai upheld deletion of Section 14A and Section 115JB additions, holding no exempt income was earned during the relevant as...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 153C and Section 143(3) assessments, holding absence of incriminating material and incorrect statutory ...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur deleted a Section 68 addition, holding that genuine share transactions cannot be treated as bogus without evidence lin...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored bad debt, TDS/VAT disallowance, Section 80G and Section 270A issues for fresh verification by the Assessin...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Rajeshri Malviya’s case. CIT(A) failed to consider additional evidence (Rule 46A) for S.54G exemption claim.
Artemis Medicare Services Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee can not be Deemed ‘Assessee in Default’ for year-end Provisions reversed in next year The ITAT, in this case held that the assessee cannot be treated as an ‘assessee in default’ u/s 201(1) merely for making year-end provisions where the payees were unidentifiable, and the provisions […]
Delhi ITAT upholds disallowance of interest under Section 57 and commission expenses due to lack of evidence of business use and genuineness.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled against penalty under 270A for misreporting income, citing correct filing and tax payment after notice. Case details.
ITAT Delhi upheld tax addition under Section 68 as assessee failed to prove identity and creditworthiness of investors in high-premium share transactions.
ITAT Nagpur remands Jeewak Welfare Society’s 80G registration rejection, citing insufficient details. Orders CIT(E) to re-evaluate case.
TAT Ahmedabad restores Seva Samarpan Charitable Trust’s 12A registration rejection, citing lack of opportunity. Orders CIT(E) to review.
ITAT Mumbai rules rental income from trust property should be treated as house property income, not business income.
Surat ITAT condones delay, restores Pareshbhai Godhani’s case to AO for fresh assessment of unexplained demonetization cash deposit.
ITAT Kolkata orders AO to remove ₹3.09 crore adjustment, citing CPC error and CIT(A)’s failure to rectify factual mistake in ITR.
