Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shiva Cement Limited (ITAT Cuttack)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Shiva Cement Limited (ITAT Cuttack) No Addition Without Incriminating Materia: ITAT Cuttack Follows Abhisar Buildwell Assessee had filed its original return of income u/s 139(1) declaring a loss of ₹1.88 Cr. A search u/s 132 was carried out in September 2014 in the case of Assessee & group concerns. Pursuant to this, the case was centralized u/s 127. Notice u/s 153A was issued, to which Assessee reiterated the same return of income as filed earlier. During assessment, AO noticed an increase in paid-up capital of ₹2.88 Cr & share premium of ₹1.46 Cr, aggregating to ₹4.35...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031