Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maloo Constructions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maloo Constructions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition – AO Cannot Rely Solely on Third-Party Information Without Enquiry Assessee, engaged in construction & government contracts, filed return declaring income of ₹6.51 crore. The case was selected for scrutiny based on REIC information alleging bogus purchase bills issued by M/s. Gandhi Iron & Steel Co. AO held that purchases worth ₹97.57 lakh from Gandhi Iron & Steel Co. were bogus, disallowing the same u/s 143(3). CIT(A) upheld disallowance, observing that mere invoices...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031