Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Snehalkumar Bhogilal Trivedi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Snehalkumar Bhogilal Trivedi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Under-Reporting or Misreporting? – Vague 270A Notice Proves Fatal- ITAT Says AO’s Confusion Invalidates 270A Penalty Assessee filed return of income for AY 2018-19 claiming exemption of capital gains u/s 54F. AO disallowed the claim of ₹25.76 lakh on the ground that Assessee had no evidence of sale or purchase of capital asset & that the exemption was wrongly claimed. Consequently, AO initiated penalty u/s 270A for misreporting of income. However, in the notice issued u/s 274, AO mentioned both defaults of under-reporting & mis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930