ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Mumbai ITAT voids reassessment proceedings for CEC-ITD CEM TPL Joint Venture, citing the Assessing Officer’s failure to adhere to Section 148A procedures, including non-disclosure of material and non-consideration of the assessee’s reply.
ITAT Lucknow allowed exemption for Long Term Capital Gains on a share sale, ruling that tax authorities cannot rely on un-furnished investigation report to dismiss a taxpayer’s claim.
The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that the TDS threshold under Section 194IA applies to the payment made to each individual seller, not the total transaction value.
The ITAT Lucknow bench deleted an addition made under Section 69A, ruling that a cash deposit from the assessee’s wife’s withdrawals was a sufficiently explained source.
The ITAT ruled that an assessment initiated before an assessee’s death is not void. It remanded the case, directing the AO to re-do the assessment in the legal heir’s name.
ITAT Chennai ruled that gold wastage during ornament manufacturing isn’t considered a payment for making charges, so TDS under Section 194C is not applicable.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that an assessee who temporarily holds cash is not its owner, leading to the deletion of Section 69A additions for unexplained money.
The ITAT ruled that unaccounted receipts from known business debtors can’t be taxed as unexplained money under Section 69A, granting relief to an assessee.
Learn about the ITAT Mumbai’s ruling in the P&G case, which found that reimbursement for ESOP and ISOP plans is a deductible business expense, not a capital or contingent expense.
The ITAT, Pune, rules that a clerical error in a trust’s registration application is a rectifiable mistake. The tribunal directs the CIT (Exemption) to reconsider the application on its merits, setting a precedent for similar cases.
