ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai rules that a company’s inadvertent Form 10-IC filing for the new tax regime is not binding if the subsequent tax return claims a MAT credit, which is impermissible under the new regime. The decision restores the company’s MAT credit claim.
ITAT Mumbai rules that CSR expenses can qualify for a Section 80G deduction, clarifying that the restriction on business deductions under Section 37 does not apply.
ITAT Bangalore rules that CIT(E) cannot deny 12AA and 80G registration based on the amount of money spent. The focus should be on the genuineness of the activities and objects.
ITAT Chennai rules that an addition under Section 69 must be based on corroborated evidence, not just third-party documents or a retracted statement.
ITAT Delhi quashes a bogus purchase addition, ruling that an entire purchase amount cannot be disallowed when corresponding sales have been accepted.
ITAT Mumbai sends back a tax case for fresh hearing, ruling that the assessee must be provided with the reasons for reopening the assessment before a final order is passed.
ITAT Bangalore sets aside a CIT(A) ex-parte dismissal, giving an assessee one more chance to present documents and a case for their disallowed expenses.
ITAT Bangalore rules that a CIT(A) cannot dismiss an appeal ex-parte for non-compliance. The court sets aside the order, instructing the CIT(A) to re-hear the case on its merits.
The ITAT Cochin ruled that cash received as a final payment during a property registration is not a violation of Section 269SS, waiving the penalty.
Read the full ITAT Indore order on an assessee’s appeal dismissed for a 3-year delay. The court examined reasons for the late filing and rejected the plea for condonation.
