ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Patna rules against a protective tax assessment on Veena Mishra, a housewife, quashing the addition after evidence of her independent income was presented.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses a PCIT’s order under Section 263, stating that revisionary powers cannot be used merely to direct the initiation of penalty proceedings.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Revenue appeals in Shaligram Infra Projects LLP case regarding on-money additions. Key takeaways on third-party documents, profit element taxation, and telescoping principle.
ITAT Ahmedabad overturns a PCIT’s order, holding that revisionary powers cannot be used to expand the scope of a limited scrutiny to include deemed dividend issues.
The ITAT Jaipur ruled that a private trust with a single minor beneficiary cannot be taxed at the Maximum Marginal Rate. A wrong ITR form filing does not take away the right to normal slab rates.
ITAT Amritsar remands an appeal after finding that the CIT(A) failed to send notices to the correct email, denying the taxpayer a fair hearing.
ITAT Pune rules that failure to verify Section 54F deduction conditions makes an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial, upholding PCIT’s revisionary powers.
ITAT Bangalore upholds income additions for Rajiv Venkatpathi Gowda after he failed to provide proof for unexplained bank deposits and admitted salary income.
ITAT Ranchi rules that an entire purchase cannot be disallowed as bogus without rejecting the books of account; only the profit element is taxable on disputed purchases.
An ITAT ruling on Aviraldhaani Foundation shows that a trust can be denied charitable registration for having a vague ‘any other activity’ clause, but natural justice must prevail.
