ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad upheld the excess cash addition and Section 153D approval, while remanding the stock shortage addition for fresh ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad deleted a Section 69 addition after finding the mother's identity, funds and gift confirmation established the sour...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT deleted the Section 271D penalty, holding temporary cash received to demonstrate visa funds was not a loan attracting...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT upheld deletion of a Section 69A addition, holding that cash withdrawals from the assessee's own bank account could n...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune upheld deletion of ₹1.14 crore Section 69C addition as it was based only on third-party statements without corroborati...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT deleted additions after finding the AO relied only on ACB information without independent inquiry or supporting evidence. ITAT deleted additions after holding that estimated marriage expenses and FDR investment were unsupported by evidence and explanations remained unchallenged.
ITAT Delhi held that assessments under Section 153C were without jurisdiction as the satisfaction note was recorded after the Finance Act, 2021 amendment. All six assessment orders were quashed.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that the amended first proviso to Section 87A refers to total income and does not distinguish between normal income and STCG taxable under Section 111A. The rebate was therefore held to be available.
ITAT Chennai held that inclusion of taxable long-term capital gains in total income does not disentitle an assessee from claiming Section 87A rebate for AY 2024-25. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the rebate and recompute the tax liability.
ITAT Rajkot held that Section 87A does not expressly prohibit rebate on tax payable on short-term capital gains under Section 111A for AY 2024-25. Following an earlier Coordinate Bench ruling, the Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal.
ITAT Agra held that neither Section 87A nor Section 111A expressly prohibits rebate on tax payable on short-term capital gains for AY 2024-25. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the rebate.
ITAT Allahabad held that estimating gross profit solely on the basis of the subsequent years GP rate is not justified after rejection of books. It directed estimation based on the average of preceding and succeeding years’ accepted trading results.
The ITAT Pune held that detailed agreements, invoices and supporting records established that management support services were actually rendered by the Associated Enterprise. It ruled that the payment was at arm’s length and deleted the entire transfer pricing adjustment.
ITAT excluded EDCIL, Just Dial, Info Edge and India Exposition Mart as transfer pricing comparables due to functional differences and restored one comparable for verification.
ITAT held interest on government grant funds was not taxable as the MOU required it to be added to the project corpus.
