Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India 14th June 2022 Inviting suggestions/inputs from public for effective and expeditious resolution of Real Estate Projects The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) was amended in 2018 to clarify the status of allottees of a real state project as Financial Creditors. However, large number of real estate projects are […]
These Regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Inspection and Investigation) (Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
These Regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Information Utilities) (Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
Understand the extension of IBC section 14 Bar to actions under SARFAESI. Learn how this ruling impacts enforcement of security interests in corporate debtor cases.
DC finds that Mr. Venkata Nagulapati has contravened the section 208(2)(a) and 208(2)(e) of the Code read with regulation 7(2) of GCHP Regulation and regulation 7(2)(a) and 7(2)(h) of IP Regulations, clause 19 of the Code of Conduct. However, considering the facts that Venkata Nagulapati has attained the age of more than 70 years and […]
Discussion Paper on enabling entities to become insolvency professional deals with issue of enabling entities to get registered as an insolvency professional (IP) under IBC 2016.
Held that a statutory institution like CoC which is in most of the cases represented by public financial institutions is expected to act in a fair and neutral manner so that the objects of IBC, 2016 can be achieved for the benefit of all.
N.C. Goel & Maya Goel Vs Piyush Infrastructure India Private Limited (NCLT Allahabad) In this case Copies of the post-dated cheques issued by the Corporate Debtor for repayment of principal amount have been enclosed. However, these cannot be taken to be unqualified admission of debt because the presumptions drawn under section 118 and section 139 […]
Indian Bank (Appellant) Vs Charu Desai (NCLAT) Commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors (CoC) for amount to be paid to different classes or subclasses of creditors in accordance with provisions of the IB Code and the related Regulations. Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in Company Appeal No. 644 of […]
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs A. Balakrishnan (Supreme Court) Facts- The present appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by NCLAT, thereby allowing the appeal filed by the respondent no. 1 – Director and reversing the order passed by NCLT, whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was […]
