Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Delve into the scope of the RTI Act, rights of applicants, and appeal procedures. Learn how to navigate through legal intricacies regarding information access.
NCLAT directs NCLT to decide on reconstitution of CoC after considering reply in Srei Equipment Finance Ltd. Vs Harsh Arora case. Full text of judgment included.
NCLAT Delhi rules on Avil Menezes’ appeal regarding CIRP costs in Sunil Hitech vs Abdul Qudduskhan case. Detailed analysis of fabrication and erection work claims.
Delhi High Court dismisses appeal against IBBI, citing res judicata principle. Full text of judgment and analysis provided.
NCLT Mumbai rules that CIRP can be initiated against Prime Cargo Movers despite their claim of being a mere agent, holding them liable for debts.
IBBI imposes penalties on Ms. J Karthiga for material information suppression, directing her to undergo pre-registration courses.
Explore the AVJ Heights vs. India Infoline case, NCLAT’s stance on Section 185 compliance in CIRP claims, implications for financial institutions, and legal analysis.
Delhi High Court rules parties in IBC proceedings must receive requisite documents forming basis of SCNs. Detailed analysis of Shantanu Prakash vs. State Bank of India & Ors. case.
NCLT determined that the certificate under the Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891, despite lacking a date, was valid as it was duly signed. They emphasized that the omission of the date did not invalidate the certificate.
“In the Milind Kashiram Jadhav vs. State Bank of India case, NCLAT Delhi examines if loan recall notice or NPA declaration determines default date under IBC Code.”
