Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The present Company petition is filed on 27/07/2023, under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, r/w. Rule 6 of the I&B (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules 2016, by JANUS GBAC LIMITED.
IBBI issues order against Mr. Rattan Chaudhry for failing to control assets during CIRP of Classic Bottle Caps.
NCLT Hyderabad dismissed the application filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of CIRP due to non-compliance of section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
The appeal by Ishrat Ali regarding his RTI application on a complaint against an insolvency professional was dismissed due to ongoing legal proceedings.
NCLT Mumbai held that entertaining objection raised by the applicant after the sale is confirmed unjustified as there is no allegation of fraud. Accordingly, application filed u/s. 60(5) of the IBC dismissed.
NCLT Mumbai dismissed the petition as not maintainable since debt in question is not undisputed debt. Accordingly, since there exists pre-existing dispute and tribunal cannot adjudicate upon such dispute.
IBBI suspends Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta for one year for contravening insolvency regulations. Details of complaints and findings in disciplinary order dated 18th October 2024.
Directors/ signatories cannot escape from their penal liability by citing its dissolution, only the accused company is dissolved and director/signatory cannot be permitted to go scot-free after the approval of resolution plan.
Karnataka High Court held that claims which are not a part of resolution plan stands extinguished, accordingly, no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not part of the resolution plan.
The Applicant is a Personal Guarantor to M/s Indian Clothing League Private Limited (the Corporate Debtor) for the cash credit facilities to the tune of Rs. 20 crore and Rs. 15 crore from the Punjab National Bank and Allahabad Bank, respectively.
