Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court held that a three-month gap between the alleged harassment and the student’s suicide broke the necessar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Goods and Services Tax : The Bombay High Court held that blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A automatically ceases after one year. The Court ruled t...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that short deduction of TDS under a different provision does not trigger disallowance under Section 40(a)(i...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that assessment orders passed under Section 62 stood deemed withdrawn after the taxpayer filed ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court held that blocking an electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A without a pre-decisional hearing was unsust...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court held that Section 83 of the CGST Act does not mandate a pre-decisional hearing before provisional attachm...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Allahabad High Court set aside a GST cancellation order for being non-speaking, without application of mind and without giving the taxpayer an opportunity of hearing, holding it violated Article 14.
The Delhi High Court held that notices sent to a GST registrant’s registered email constitute valid service, rejecting claims that personal hearing notices were not received. Proper email communication fulfills natural justice requirements.
Bombay High Court held that once appellate authorities delete a penalty under Section 271(1)(c), no substantial question of law arises. Revenue’s appeal was dismissed.
Delhi High Court held that curbing right to appear in examination due to non-fulfilling mandatory physical attendance norms is contrary to spirit of NEP, 2020 and also UGC Regulations. Accordingly, Court directs to re-consider the same.
The Court ruled that blocking ITC beyond available credit under Rule 86A is invalid, directing authorities to remove negative blocking from the taxpayer’s Electronic Credit Ledger.
Delhi HC held that a show cause notice issued for excess ITC was within the statutory three-month period prior to the outer limit under Section 73. The SCN and order are not time-barred.
Dismissing borrower’s petition, High Court held that a 15-day gap between publication and auction meets statutory requirement for a subsequent sale and that auction notice contained sufficient property description and valid valuation.
Madras High Court permitted Tvl. Red Rose Garments to debit 50% of its four-month tax dues from a negatively blocked ITC ledger, pending final proceedings.
Madras High Court remitted a case for fresh adjudication after finding that fake invoices were generated in the petitioner’s GSTR-1 by an auditor to aid wrongful ITC claims.
Gujarat High Court quashed CBDT’s rejection and condoned delay in Sysco Industries’ income tax return filing, holding that insolvency and fire caused genuine hardship.
