Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held morphed obscene images are a serious attack on a woman's privacy and dignity. It directed prompt police action and ...
Corporate Law : The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the acquittal after finding the relationship was consensual. A later refusal to marry did not e...
Corporate Law : The Patna High Court held that media must avoid labels implying guilt before a trial concludes. It directed news platforms to rest...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court emphasized that Section 74 requires clear evidence of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression and cannot ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court held that a GST order based on a notice issued to a dissolved company is void, while allowing fresh proceedings ...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court quashed the assessment, demand and penalty proceedings after holding that the assessee was denied a meaningful...
Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh HC granted bail after finding no unimpeachable document proving the applicant owned the firm. Issues of involvement w...
Custom Duty : Bombay HC held that pendency of a writ petition does not prevent authorities from undertaking provisional assessment of imports af...
Corporate Law : Tripura High Court acquitted the accused after finding the complainant failed to prove financial capacity and valid statutory noti...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Rainbow Infrastructure Private Limited & Anr Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has issued notice to Centre and State Government in the matter of Latika Ghosh Vs ACST, Raiganj Charge & others, W.P. A. No. 7272 of 2020, in the matter of Rainbow Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACST, Barrackpore Zone & […]
The issue under consideration is whether the writ petition filed against credit rating agency by stating that they are not authorised to discharge “Public Functions” as it is not characterised as ‘State ‘ will be sustain in law?
Online fantasy sports games offered on the Dream 11 platforms were not considered as gambling/betting as the format of online fantasy game offered by Dream 11 was a game of mere skill and their business had protection under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Krishna Kumar Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Pension can not be withheld for indefinite period contrary to Section 9(4) of C.G. Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1976. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is now aged about 80 years […]
Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Vs Sutherland Global Services Private Limited (Madras High Court) Whether the Assessee is entitled to utilise and set off the accumulated unutilised amount of Education Cess (EC), Secondary and Higher Education Cess (SHEC) and Krishi Kalyan Cess (KKC), all jointly referred to as the “Cess” against the Output […]
Court under Section 260A would not interfere with the Tribunal’s finding of fact could not be applied to the facts of case because the Tribunal did not record any finding of fact that the finding of fact recorded by AO was erroneous and not borne out by records. Thus, the order passed by Tribunal for not calculating the undisclosed income was set aside
The issue under consideration is whether the petitioner is eligible for exemption from payment of entry tax based on certificates granted under Madhya Pradesh Udyog Nivesh Samvardhan Sahayta Yojna?
Confederation of GST Professionals and Industries Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) CGPI had filed writ petition for extension of due date of GSTR 9 and 9C before Bombay high court and Honorable High Court has fixed next hearing on 27th October, 2020. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT Heard learned Sr. […]
The issue under consideration whether deduction under section 80IA(4) can be claimed on Container Freight Station (CFS) as it constitutes an ‘inland port’? Container Freight Station Constitutes as Inland Port Hence Eligible for Deduction u/s 80IA(4).
PVR Ltd. Vs Commercial Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Online booking charges or internet handling charges was not a mandatory payment for gaining entry into the cinema hall, it was an additional payment for extra or other facility provided by the Cinema hall owner thus, the same could not be subjected to entertainment tax. […]
