Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Rakesh Sarin (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1997-98 to 2002-03 and part of 2003-2004
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

PCIT Vs Rakesh Sarin (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Court under Section 260A would not interfere with the Tribunal’s finding of fact could not be applied to the facts of case because the Tribunal did not record any finding of fact that the finding of fact recorded by AO was erroneous and not borne out by records. Thus, the order passed by Tribunal for not calculating the undisclosed income was set aside

Held: Assessee-individual was engaged in the b

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031