Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
IBBI rejects appeal by valuer Vipan Kumar against 3-month suspension over non-compliance in valuation report for Base Corporation’s insolvency case.
IBBI cancelled Mr. Shreegopal Govindram Mundhra’s valuer registration for suppressing pending criminal charges during his application. This action highlights integrity requirements.
A study by IIM Bangalore highlights how IBC has improved credit discipline, reduced borrowing costs, and strengthened governance in Indian firms.
This article aims to examines the legal basis for the resolution applicant’s right to run the business post-implementation, the absence of judicial precedent on when a plan is deemed fully implemented, and whether plan terms (such as mandatory continued listing) can bind the acquirer indefinitely.
The IBBI has consolidated nine Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) forms into five, introducing a monthly reporting cycle to reduce compliance burden for Insolvency Professionals.
IBBI amends CIRP regulations to include provisions on interim finance observers, staged payments, and expressions of interest for asset or full entity sales.
NCLAT Delhi held that the communication of Section 8 Demand Notice via registered email address of Corporate Debtor is valid service of demand notice. Accordingly, admission of application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code justifiable.
The IBBI’s 3rd Amendment Regulations, 2025 streamline corporate insolvency resolution by introducing new forms (CP-1 to CP-5) to improve transparency, timeliness, and accountability in reporting.
NCLT Delhi held that the pendency of proceedings before Debt Recovery Tribunal [DRT] does not preclude or bar the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC].
NCLT Delhi held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] for initiation of CIRP not maintainable since there exists genuine and long-standing disputes. Accordingly, petition dismissed.
