Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Fifth Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
Udit Jain (Sole Proprietor of M/s U.J. Trading Co.) Vs Apace Builders and Contractors Pvt. Ltd (NCLT Delhi) HC held that in application filed under section 9 of IBC, 2016 only the date of filing needs to be considered and not the date of sending the Demand Notice. It is seen that notification of MCA dated […]
Time lines are fixed with a definite purpose & bidding process should conclude at scheduled time. Applicant cannot complain after failing to submit EMD within time.
Analysis of recent amendments to IBC Regulations covering Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), Liquidation Process, and Voluntary Liquidation Process by IBBI. Changes include mandatory communication in CIR process, extended timeline for Information Memorandum submission, and reduced timeline for compromise proposal in liquidation. The article provides an in-depth overview of amendments, ensuring clarity for stakeholders in the insolvency ecosystem.
Adjudicating Authority has only given an opportunity to the Corporate Debtor to deposit the entire defaulted amount for which Section 7 Application was filed, within 45 days with liberty reserve to the Financial Creditor to revive the Section 7 Application in event the amount is not deposited.
Sabita A. Biswas Vs Vinodkumar Pukhraj Ambavat (NCLAT Delhi) Appellant sought direction to Resolution Professional to accept the claim. Appellant has filed claim in Form-C along with the claim, Appellant has also filed photocopy of unregistered sale deed engrossed on Rs. 100/- and stamp paper allegedly executed before the Notary on 13.01.2015. The Adjudicating Authority […]
NCLAT Delhi, in Amit Jain v. Siemens Financial Services Pvt. Ltd held that Section 10A of IBC, 2016 is applicable only to corporate debtor & not to personal guarantor of corporate debtor
NCLT Held that suspended board of directors were involved in running the business of corporate debtor in a fraudulent & wrongful manner, therefore, responsible & liable under provision of Section 66 of IBC, 2016
Held that initiation of CIRP under I&B code cannot be nullified by any order passed by SEBI nor can be a ground to reject an application.
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 16th September, 2022 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2022 No. IBBI/2022-23/GN/REG094.– In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (t) of sub-section (1) of section 196 read with section 240 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of […]
