Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
This order concerns disciplinary proceedings against Mr. Sai Ramesh Kanuparthi, an Insolvency Professional (IP), regarding his conduct in the liquidation process of M/s Konaseema Gas Power Limited. Mr. Kanuparthi has been accused of contravening several regulations and codes of conduct, including the sale of assets without adhering to prescribed procedures and failing to value or […]
IBC requires the prioritized payment of Insolvency Resolution Process and Liquidation costs. Under the IBC, these costs must be given precedence when distributing funds during insolvency proceedings.
NCLAT Delhi held that the email of 05.05.2017 cannot be viewed as an acknowledgment of liability on the part of the Corporate Debtor and hence cannot help in extending the period of limitation.
Supreme Court held that for calculating limitation period for filing an appeal to NCLAT, the date on which order was pronounced and the time taken to provide certified copy is to be excluded.
NCLT Mumbai held that as per section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Code) company under Liquidation is disbarred from initiating any legal proceedings without seeking the prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority. Accordingly, the Liquidator was not competent to initiate proceedings u/s. 7 of the Code.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has issued an order to cancel the registration of Mr. Venkata Krishna Srinivasa Raju Penmetsa as a Registered Valuer. The order was issued based on a Show Cause Notice (SCN) which stated that Mr. Penmetsa had suppressed information about criminal proceedings against him while applying for registration. The […]
Understand the eligibility criteria for filing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC 2016). Learn about the minimum default amount, who can file an application, and who is not entitled to initiate insolvency proceedings.
Explore the NCLT Delhi judgment in Ajit Kaur Gill vs. Raheja Developers case, a detailed analysis of the operational debt dispute, and why the claim was dismissed.
Explore directors’ liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act during the moratorium period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Learn about legal precedents, the nature of offenses, and the accountability of directors. Stay informed on the intersection of the NI Act and IBC.
Supreme Court, in the present Supertech Ltd matter, adopted lower risk of injustice even if ultimately in the aforesaid appeals, the Hon’ble Supreme Court may find otherwise or choose any other course.
