Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
The Supreme Court of India ruled in K. Kishan vs. Vijay Nirman Company that a pending challenge to an arbitral award constitutes a pre-existing dispute, which can block insolvency proceedings under the IBC.
The Delhi government’s decision to drop arbitration clauses from new contracts clashes with India’s national push for ADR, raising concerns about legal efficiency and investor confidence.
Delhi High Court confirms arbitral award for Fujitsu’s offshore supplies is business income, not taxable in India under Japan-India DTAA.
Analysing how moratorium under IBC affects arbitration proceedings and the legal ambiguity around continuation or initiation during insolvency resolution.
Calcutta High Court held that application u/s. 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 decided by Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction and not a Commercial Court inasmuch as the dispute between the parties is a commercial dispute is without jurisdiction.
The evolution of Indian arbitration law from the Bhatia International case to the BALCO judgment, and its impact on international commercial arbitration in India.
A summary of emergency arbitration in India, examining the legal landscape, the impact of the Amazon v. Future Retail case, and the need for legislative reform.
The ONGC vs Saw Pipes case introduced “patent illegality” as a ground to set aside arbitral awards, expanding judicial review in Indian arbitration law.
A summary of the Supreme Court’s landmark 2012 ruling in BALCO v. Kaiser, which defined the territorial limits of Indian courts in foreign-seated arbitration.
Bombay High Court sets aside personal liability for One Person Company director in arbitration, upholding asset deposit by the company. Judgment clarifies Section 17 powers.
