Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Lease Plan India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Rudraksh Pharma Distributor & Ors.: Delhi HC confirms sufficiency of service via email & WhatsApp in arbitration proceedings.
Analysis of Dhansar Engineering Company Private Limited vs Eastern Coalfields Limited case by Calcutta High Court regarding the validity of a policy circular as an arbitration clause.
Explore Allahabad High Court’s judgment on predeposit under Section 19 of MSMED Act in the case of Docket Care Systems Vs. Hariwill Electronics. Analysis and implications discussed.
It is not open to a party to presume for himself any disqualification, which may be incurred by an Arbitrator and straightway approach High Court without giving an opportunity to Arbitrator to rebut the same.
Learn about Karnataka High Court’s ruling on excluding period of stay in arbitral tribunal proceedings for calculating twelve-month limitation under Section 29A(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rani Constructions Pvt Ltd vs Union of India: Delhi High Court rules membership of an arbitral institution is not mandatory to invoke arbitration, setting a precedent.
Delve into the jurisdictional complexities of Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. vs. Uma Earth Movers case as Calcutta High Court adjudicates concurrent jurisdiction and arbitration clauses.
Read the detailed analysis of the Delhi High Court’s decision to set aside an arbitral award in the case of Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt Ltd. vs Samtel Display Systems Ltd. Learn about the contradictory findings and legal implications.
Delhi High Court rules validity of arbitration notice under Section 21 cannot be challenged for wrong address, appoints arbitrator for dispute resolution.
Delhi HC dismisses an application under Section 27 of the Arbitration Act, directing the Arbitral Tribunal to assess evidence relevancy prima facie.
