Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Chartered Accountants are critical in arbitration as expert witnesses and arbitrators. Their financial expertise helps resolve complex disputes like valuation, settlements, and accounting irregularities efficiently.
The Supreme Court set aside an arbitral award delivered nearly four years after hearings ended, holding that such unexplained delay violates fairness and public policy. A fresh arbitration was ordered before a new tribunal.
Calcutta High Court allows SREI Finance’s arbitration plea for Rs.130 Cr loan default, ruling that NCLT fraud allegations are triable issues for the arbitrator, not a bar.
The Delhi High Court rules that arbitral awards based on unsubstantiated CA certificates are invalid, requiring arbitrators to rely on concrete, verifiable evidence.
Learn how arbitration can resolve international digital tax disputes between governments and multinational corporations, offering a path to stability and avoiding trade conflicts.
The Delhi High Court has granted an extension for an arbitral tribunal’s mandate, even after the 12-month period expired, citing a Supreme Court precedent and a pending corporate insolvency case.
Chhattisgarh High Court dismisses Educomp’s plea to quash a bank guarantee invocation, citing ongoing arbitration proceedings as the matter’s proper forum.
The Delhi High Court refers a non-compete and intellectual property dispute to arbitration, upholding the validity of the arbitration agreement despite challenges from former employees.
Delhi High Court held that any award passed by an arbitrator unilaterally appointed by an interested party is vitiated. Accordingly, ex-parte arbitral award passed is liable to be set aside.
Delhi High Court held that there was no requirement to resort to Clause 25(c) of GTC to formally notify the ICA for appointment of the Arbitrator and notice sent by invoking arbitration agreement u/s. 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is valid invocation.
