Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : Explores how arbitration is often perceived as confidential, but legal and public interest obligations frequently limit this priva...
Company Law : The MCA now mandates e-Adjudication for corporate penalties, streamlining notices, filings, and orders. This reform accelerates co...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : Despite arguable points raised, the Supreme Court declined interference since arbitration had commenced before a senior arbitrator...
Corporate Law : The Court held that designation of New Delhi as the arbitration venue amounts to the juridical seat, conferring supervisory jurisd...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether interim protection lapses if a Section 11 petition is filed beyond 90 days. The Supreme Court held that arbi...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether the High Court could interfere with an arbitral award upheld under Section 34. The Supreme Court held that S...
Corporate Law : Rejecting objections on non-existence of the arbitration clause, the court applied the doctrine of separability. Arbitration was h...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Indus Power Tech Inc. Vs Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has determined that a company cannot be restrained from conducting its business following the termination of a contract, emphasizing that non-compete clauses do not provide grounds for injunctive relief after such termination. The case involved […]
The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institutional arbitration.
Learn about the impact of arbitration clauses in India’s credit card agreements and how they affect consumer rights, dispute resolution, and industry practices.
Explore the pros and cons of Investment Treaty Arbitration compared to domestic courts, analyzing neutrality, enforceability, costs, transparency, and more.
Understand third-party funding in Indian arbitration, its legal challenges, and the need for regulations to improve access and ensure fairness in dispute resolution.
Explore the scope and limits of patent illegality under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, focusing on judicial scrutiny and landmark case laws in India.
Calcutta High Court held that application for setting aside of an award under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be made after three months from the date of arbitral award. Thus, application made after the time period is barred by limitation.
Delhi High Court rules in Mukesh Udeshi vs Jindal Steel Power Ltd, emphasizing that only parties to arbitration proceedings can challenge an arbitral award.
Explore Delhi High Court’s rulings on arbitration of lock-in periods in employment contracts, with detailed case analyses and legal insights.
The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at GIFT IFSC to IFSCA, focusing on efficient dispute resolution.
