Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Himanshu Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Himanshu Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Slams Enhancement in Section 264 Proceedings – Past Salary Savings During Demonetisation Accepted, ₹4.55 Lakh Addition Deleted The Bangalore ITAT held that proceedings under Section 264 are benevolent in nature and cannot be used by the Assessing Officer to place the assessee in a worse position than in the original assessment. In this case, the assessee had deposited ₹11.75 lakh during demonetisation and explained the source as salary received in cash over multiple years along with savings therefrom. The AO in the original assessment had al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

CSR Disallowance Under Section 37 Does Not Bar Relief Under Section 80G- Bangalore ITAT Bangalore ITAT Deletes ₹99.24 Lakh Ad Hoc Disallowance Backed by Evidence Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930