Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Himanshu Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Himanshu Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Slams Enhancement in Section 264 Proceedings – Past Salary Savings During Demonetisation Accepted, ₹4.55 Lakh Addition Deleted The Bangalore ITAT held that proceedings under Section 264 are benevolent in nature and cannot be used by the Assessing Officer to place the assessee in a worse position than in the original assessment. In this case, the assessee had deposited ₹11.75 lakh during demonetisation and explained the source as salary received in cash over multiple years along with savings therefrom. The AO in the original assessment had al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031