This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Slams Enhancement in Section 264 Proceedings – Past Salary Savings During Demonetisation Accepted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Himanshu Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Himanshu Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
ITAT Slams Enhancement in Section 264 Proceedings – Past Salary Savings During Demonetisation Accepted, ₹4.55 Lakh Addition Deleted
The Bangalore ITAT held that proceedings under Section 264 are benevolent in nature and cannot be used by the Assessing Officer to place the assessee in a worse position than in the original assessment. In this case, the assessee had deposited ₹11.75 lakh during demonetisation and explained the source as salary received in cash over multiple years along with savings therefrom. The AO in the original ...




