Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Time Technoplast Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Time Technoplast Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) Section 80IC Deduction Depreciation Allowed on Consistency; Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 12% – ITAT Mumbai The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue’s appeals for AYs 2016-17 & 2018-19 in the case of Time Technoplast Ltd., holding that all issues stood squarely covered in assessee’s own case by earlier ITAT orders. On deduction u/s 80IC, the Tribunal noted that identical disallowances made on the allegation of inter-unit transfer of pre-used plant & machinery (exceeding 20%) had already been deleted consistently from AY 2008-09 onwa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for VSI Contribution & Section 244A Interest Skill Development Institution Qualifies as ‘Education’; Section 12AA/12AB Registration Restored: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable for Transport Booking Agent; Income Restricted to 3%: Pune ITAT Investor Cannot Be Denied Section 10(35) Exemption for Mutual Fund Violations: Pune ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Vague Reasons & Lack of Supporting Material: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031