Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Time Technoplast Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Time Technoplast Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) Section 80IC Deduction Depreciation Allowed on Consistency; Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 12% – ITAT Mumbai The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue’s appeals for AYs 2016-17 & 2018-19 in the case of Time Technoplast Ltd., holding that all issues stood squarely covered in assessee’s own case by earlier ITAT orders. On deduction u/s 80IC, the Tribunal noted that identical disallowances made on the allegation of inter-unit transfer of pre-used plant & machinery (exceeding 20%) had already been deleted consistently from AY 2008-09 onwa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Cash Withdrawn Earlier Cannot Become ‘Unexplained Cash’ on Re-Deposit: ITAT Bangalore SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031