Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Chandubhai Raojibhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Chandubhai Raojibhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad Rejects DVO-Based Addition on Market Value; Unexplained Investment Cannot Be Assumed Without Cost Determination The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of additions made in the hands of the assessee for AY 2012-13. The case arose from reopening of assessment where the Assessing Officer had made (i) an addition of ₹27.05 lakh treating bank deposits as unexplained and (ii) a substantial addition of ₹4.19 crore under section 69 towards alleged unaccounted investment i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031