This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Unexplained Investment Cannot Be Assumed Without Cost Determination: ITAT Ahmedabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Chandubhai Raojibhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Chandubhai Raojibhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad Rejects DVO-Based Addition on Market Value; Unexplained Investment Cannot Be Assumed Without Cost Determination
The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of additions made in the hands of the assessee for AY 2012-13. The case arose from reopening of assessment where the Assessing Officer had made (i) an addition of ₹27.05 lakh treating bank deposits as unexplained and (ii) a substantial addition of ₹4.19 crore under section 69 towards alleged unaccou...
Author Info
