Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muthukuru Venkata Subba Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Muthukuru Venkata Subba Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

CIT(A) Ignored Evidence – ITAT Remands ₹15.55 Cr Addition on Joint Bank Account for Fresh Verification, Cites Violation of Natural Justice; Director’s Liability on Company Funds: ITAT Remands Case to Verify Ownership of Bank Deposits 

Assessee, an individual &  Director in M/s Evergreen Entertainers Pvt. Ltd., did not file return of income as his salary income was only ₹52,000. The AO reopened the case u/s 147 after noticing huge credits of ₹9.61 crore in a joint bank account with Andhra

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031