This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Redeposited Cash Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained: ITAT Delhi Deletes Addition
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sunil Kumar Vij Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sunil Kumar Vij Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Cash Deposits During Demonetization Explained by Prior Withdrawals – ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69A
Delhi ITAT has held that where an Assessee substantiates cash deposits during the demonetization period with sufficient prior withdrawals, such deposits cannot be treated as unexplained u/s 69A.
Assessee, a retired Railway employee, filed his return declaring income from pension, savings bank interest & arrear salary. During assessment, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹15.35 lakh during demonetization in Assessee’s bank account with India...





