Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Najma Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Najma Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow) Reopening U/s 148 Quashed – Order U/s 148A(d) Passed Before Expiry of Reply Time & Without Considering Assessee’s Reply – ITAT Lucknow The assessee’s case was reopened based on information from the Insight Portal alleging large bitcoin trading and unexplained investment of ₹88.55 lakh. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144 and made addition u/s 69, which was confirmed by CIT(A). Before ITAT, the assessee raised additional legal grounds challenging validity of reopening. It was demonstrated that notice u/s 148A(b) granted time till 31.03....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031