Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Najma Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Najma Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow) Reopening U/s 148 Quashed – Order U/s 148A(d) Passed Before Expiry of Reply Time & Without Considering Assessee’s Reply – ITAT Lucknow The assessee’s case was reopened based on information from the Insight Portal alleging large bitcoin trading and unexplained investment of ₹88.55 lakh. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144 and made addition u/s 69, which was confirmed by CIT(A). Before ITAT, the assessee raised additional legal grounds challenging validity of reopening. It was demonstrated that notice u/s 148A(b) granted time till 31.03....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930