Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pathan Wajeed Khan Manzoor Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pathan Wajeed Khan Manzoor Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Pune ITAT: Cash Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained Money When Scrap Business Turnover Is Accepted in Other Years The Pune ITAT set aside an assessment where the Assessing Officer had treated cash deposits of ₹1.28 crore in the assessee’s bank account as unexplained money under section 69A and taxed the same under section 115BBE. The assessee, engaged in the scrap business for several years, explained that due to a hard-disk crash and loss of data, the turnover reflected in one bank account could not be incorporated while filing the return ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930