Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Singhal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Amit Singhal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi) No 143(2), No Reassessment: Return Filed, AO Can’t Pretend Otherwise—ITAT Delhi Quashes Entire 147 Proceedings Assessee’s assessment for AY 2017-18 was reopened u/s 147 alleging cash deposit of ₹1 crore. Though Assessee had filed return in response to notice u/s 148 on 07.10.2021 and duly e-verified it on 22.02.2022, AO proceeded to complete reassessment u/s 144 on the premise that no valid return was filed, without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2), and made addition of ₹1 crore u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE. NFAC upheld the action holding that since retu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031