Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ketan Priyavadan Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ketan Priyavadan Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) In the case before the Tribunal, Assessee had challenged a penalty levied u/s 270A, following what was alleged as “under-reporting of income” for assessment year 2020-21. The penalty order was confirmed by CIT(A) (NFAC) on 30 June 2025, amounting to ₹ 13,86,849. AO had initiated penalty proceedings and imposed the penalty based on the quantum of income determined in the assessment. However, when the matter came before the Tribunal, it was noticed that the quantum appeal (ITA No. 734/Ahd/2025) for the same assessment year had already been rest...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031