Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ketan Priyavadan Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ketan Priyavadan Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) In the case before the Tribunal, Assessee had challenged a penalty levied u/s 270A, following what was alleged as “under-reporting of income” for assessment year 2020-21. The penalty order was confirmed by CIT(A) (NFAC) on 30 June 2025, amounting to ₹ 13,86,849. AO had initiated penalty proceedings and imposed the penalty based on the quantum of income determined in the assessment. However, when the matter came before the Tribunal, it was noticed that the quantum appeal (ITA No. 734/Ahd/2025) for the same assessment year had already been rest...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930