Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Hoshang Manekji Havewala (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 1999-2000
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Hoshang Manekji Havewala (ITAT Mumbai) Foreign HSBC account addition deleted – BUP ID & “Base Note” held insufficient evidence; estimation @17% arbitrary – ITAT Mumbai In ACIT vs Hoshang Manekji Havewala (A.Ys. 1996-97 to 2000-01), reassessment was initiated based on information received from the French Government alleging undisclosed HSBC Geneva accounts with an assumed investment of US $3 million. The AO estimated income by applying a 17% annual return and made addition of ₹1.70 crore as unexplained income. The ITAT upheld the deletion made by CIT(A), observing that the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930