Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dineshkumar Nemichand Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dineshkumar Nemichand Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Pick & Choose Approach of CIT(A) Rejected – Demonetisation Deposits Cannot Be Singled Out – Treated as Business Income Not u/s 69A -ITAT Ahmedabad AO had made two additions: ₹26,57,500 – cash deposits during demonetisation, treated as unexplained u/s 69A & ₹11,11,800 – net profit estimated @ 8% of turnover. CIT(A) partly allowed appeal, sustaining ₹26.57 lakh addition as unexplained, while estimating NP @ 6% on other business income Assessee’s Arguments Cash deposits during demonetisation were from regular business...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930