Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Udit Goyal Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Udit Goyal Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Carry Forward of Capital Loss: 12-Day Delay in ITR Filing During COVID Deserves Liberal View-Delhi HC Remands Case Genuine Hardship Can’t Be Ignored – Technicalities Can’t Defeat Justice- Pandemic Hardship Valid Ground for Delay Delhi High Court considered a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application u/s 119(2)(b). The petitioner had filed his ITR for AY 2021–22 belatedly on 12.01.2022, i.e., with a delay of 12 days, claiming carry forward of long-term capital loss of ₹41.85 lakh from securities transactions. PCIT rejected his cond...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031