Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pinkeshkumar Melapchand Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pinkeshkumar Melapchand Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Deeming fiction u/s 69A cannot be invoked mechanically or in terrorem : ITAT Ahmedabad: ITAT Deletes ₹16.69 Lakh Addition for Cash Deposits – Sales Proceeds from Garment Business Accepted; Section 44AD Presumptive Taxation Applies Ahmedabad ITAT  has deleted an addition of ₹16,69,608/- made u/s  69A in respect of cash deposits in Assessee’s bank a/c, holding that the deposits represented recorded sales proceeds from his garment trading business &  were taxable, if at all, only under presumptive provisions of sec 44AD. Assess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930