Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pinkeshkumar Melapchand Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pinkeshkumar Melapchand Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Deeming fiction u/s 69A cannot be invoked mechanically or in terrorem : ITAT Ahmedabad: ITAT Deletes ₹16.69 Lakh Addition for Cash Deposits – Sales Proceeds from Garment Business Accepted; Section 44AD Presumptive Taxation Applies Ahmedabad ITAT  has deleted an addition of ₹16,69,608/- made u/s  69A in respect of cash deposits in Assessee’s bank a/c, holding that the deposits represented recorded sales proceeds from his garment trading business &  were taxable, if at all, only under presumptive provisions of sec 44AD. Assess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930