Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandan Steel Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandan Steel Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Facts: Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹27.51 Cr. Scrutiny was initiated, specifically to examine Chapter VI-A deductions. AO passed assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B accepting returned income.PCIT later invoked revision u/s 263, noting that assessee had debited ₹39.93 lakh towards CSR, added it back in computation, but simultaneously claimed deduction u/s 80G. PCIT held deduction u/s 80G on CSR spend as not allowable, treating AO’s order as erroneous & prejudicial to revenue. Directed AO to re-examine deduction. Assessee’s Con...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930