Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

CSR Donations Eligible u/s 80G – 263 Revision Quashed-ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 8158
Case Name
Chandan Steel Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-21
Advertisement

Chandan Steel Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Facts: Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹27.51 Cr. Scrutiny was initiated, specifically to examine Chapter VI-A deductions. AO passed assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B accepting returned income.PCIT later invoked revision u/s 263, noting that assessee had debited ₹39.93 lakh towards CSR, added it back in computation, but simultaneously claimed deduction u/s 80G. PCIT held deduction u/s 80G on CSR spend as not allowable, treating AO’s order as erroneous & prejudicial to revenue. Directed AO to re-examine deduction.

Assessee’s Contentions

  • CSR expenses disallowed u/s 37, but donations to approved institutions qualify u/s 80G.
  • AO had specifically raised queries during scrutiny, assessee submitted donation receipts & 80G certificates, and AO recorded in order that claim was examined.
  • Hence, assessment was passed after due enquiry.
  • PCIT’s revision was based on audit objection (borrowed satisfaction), without independent application of mind.
  • Relied on Mahansaria Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT [2025] 175 taxmann.com 885 (Mum-Trib) & other ITAT rulings.

Revenue’s Stand

  • CSR spends are mandated by law & lack voluntariness, hence cannot qualify as donations u/s 80G.
  • AO failed to properly enquire into allowability.
  • Cited SC ruling in PVG Raju (Raja of Vizianagaram) [101 ITR 465] where voluntariness was considered essential for a donation.

Tribunal’s Observations/ Decision

  • Coordinate Benches (e.g., Sikka Ports, Blue Dart Express, L&T Finance Ltd.) have consistently held that while CSR is disallowed u/s 37, deduction u/s 80G is available if conditions are satisfied.
  • Voluntariness test is met if there is no quid pro quo; CSR donations to approved institutions still retain character of donations.
  • AO had examined assessee’s claim during scrutiny; hence it was not a case of “no enquiry”.
  • PCIT cannot invoke 263 merely because Department’s appeal is pending before HC on similar issues.
  • View taken by AO was legally sustainable & supported by ITAT precedents.
  • ITAT quashed PCIT’s order u/s 263.
  • Assessment order of AO restored.
  • Appeal of Assessee allowed.
  • CSR spends, though disallowed u/s 37, are eligible for deduction u/s 80G if donations are made to approved institutions. Once AO has examined claim during scrutiny, PCIT cannot revise u/s 263 on audit objections or change of opinion

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 7,053

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.