Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : R 249 Kulithalai Co-op Pard Bank Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
R 249 Kulithalai Co-op Pard Bank Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) 80P Denial Can’t Pre-empt Condonation – CPC & CIT(A) Jumped the Gun; Matter Remanded Chennai ITAT set aside the order denying deduction u/s 80P to R 249 Kulithalai Co-op Primary Bank Ltd. for AY 2022-23, holding that the authorities acted prematurely while a condonation petition u/s 119(2)(b) was pending before the PCIT. The Assessee, a co-operative credit society, had filed its return belatedly u/s 139(4) and claimed deduction u/s 80P, which CPC denied by invoking section 80AC for failure to file within due date u/s 13...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031