Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs MisarYar Khan (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ITO Vs MisarYar Khan (ITAT Lucknow) The ITAT Lucknow upheld the view that large bank deposits of ₹2.69 crore could not be taxed as unexplained income under Section 69A, and instead represented business turnover from the assessee’s Zari & Zardozi business. Accordingly, invocation of Section 69A read with Section 115BBE was rejected. While the CIT(A) had already granted relief by treating the deposits as turnover and estimating income at 10%, the Tribunal found this rate to be arbitrary and excessive. Relying on the assessee’s past accepted profit margins (around 1.65%-2.14%), the ITAT...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031