Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nutaan Sarada Himghar Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nutaan Sarada Himghar Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) The assessee challenged the validity of the scrutiny assessment on the ground that the notice issued under section 143(2) by the NFAC was not in the format mandated by CBDT for computer-aided e-scrutiny. The notice merely stated that the return was selected for scrutiny but did not conform to the standardised e-proceeding format prescribed by CBDT Instruction F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017. Relying on several coordinate bench decisions, including Durga Automotives Pvt. Ltd., Sajal Biswas, Tapas Kumar Das and Shib Nath Ghosh, the Tribuna...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031