Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Wahi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Sanjay Wahi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Section 69A Cannot Apply to Mere Seized Documents – Delhi ITAT Recasts Undisclosed Commission, Restricts Addition to 20% of Gross Commission Delhi ITAT examined an addition made during search proceedings where a seized document reflected gross commission receipts of Rs.11,63,955/-. AO treated the entire gross commission as unexplained money u/s 69A, & CIT(A) confirmed the view holding that the document was not a dumb paper & that no evidence of expense allocation or sharing arrangement with franchises/investor clinic was produced. Before the Tribunal,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031