Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Kumar Burnwal Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Kumar Burnwal Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) No 271(1)(c) Penalty on Peak Credit Additions: ITAT Deletes Penalty After Quantum Relief on Estimated Basis The Kolkata ITAT deleted penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) after holding that once quantum addition itself is restricted on the basis of peak credit theory and estimated computation, penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive. The assessee, Santosh Kumar Burnwal, had originally faced addition of ₹1.70 crore on account of unexplained cash deposits in an ICICI Bank account. During appellate proceedings, the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031