Having regard to the genesis of the dispute as well as the issue as to whether the appellant is likely to flee from justice if he were to be permitted to travel to the US, we find, on the basis of the previous record of the appellant, that there is no reason or justification to deny him the permission which has been sought to travel to the US for eight weeks.
Satish Chandra Verma Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) In the instant case, the appellant who is a member of the All India Services has paid leave to his credit and has applied to go to U.S.A. and France to visit members of his family who are residing there. On an earlier occasion […]
Supreme Court decision in Anatbhai Shah Vs State of Gujarat. Condition to deposit Rs.2 crores set aside. Learn about the ruling’s impact.
Supreme Court held that travel with a foreign leg is not covered under the provisions of section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, TDS deductible on the same under section 192(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Supreme Court has reversed the decision of Guj HC Decision & allowed the Revenue Appeal GST/Customs – Section 3(7) and Section (9) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – Exemption of IGST and GST Compensation Cess on import of inputs against Advance Authorization – Revenue appeal against Gujarat High Court judgment wherein mandatory fulfilment of a ‘pre-import condition’ incorporated in the Foreign Trade Policy of 2015-2020 and Handbook of Procedures 2015-2020 by Notification No. 33/2015-20 and Notification No. 79/2017-Customs, dated 13.10.2017 was held to be arbitrary and unreasonable
Any actions that could endanger the natural ecosystem and the life, health, and safety of all living things are prohibited by environmental law.
No penalty is envisaged under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction and for belated remittance /payment/deposit of the TDS.
Tribunal Decision determining ALP can be challenged on grounds of perversity & non observance of transfer pricing rules in individual cases
SC set aside the order passed by the High Court imposing a condition of deposit while granting bail to the appellant therein.
As a consequence, any loss incurred by way of an expenditure by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law is not deductible in terms of Explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Act.
