Except the deductions provided under the first proviso to Section 6B(1) nothing else can be deducted from the total turnover as defined under Section 2(u2) for the purpose of levy of turnover tax under Section 6B of the Act.
Properties were purchased by the defendant with some financial assistance from his father, however, the same cannot be sole determinative factor to hold the transaction as benami in nature.The plaintiff has miserably failed to establish and prove the intention of the father to purchase properties for and on behalf of the family, which were purchased in the names of defendant.
Provisions of Section 142(2C) as they stood prior to the amendment which was enacted with effect from 1 April 2008 by the Finance Act, 2008 did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by AO to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by assessee. Thus, AO who prescribed time limit for filing auditor’s report under Section 142(2A) was also entitled to extend time limit even if extension was not sought by assessee.
PCIT Tax Vs M/s. Oil Industry Development Board (Supreme Court) Hon’ble supreme court held that in the absence of any exempt income, disallowance under Section 14-A of the Act of any amount was not permissible. FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT Delay condoned. In view of the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income […]
G Ramesh Vs Kanike Harish Kumar Ujwal & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) In terms of the explanation to Section 141, the expression ‘company’ has been defined to mean any body corporate and to include a firm or other association of Sub-section (1) of Section 141 postulates that where an offence is committed under Section […]
Presumption that investment is made out of interest free funds is possible when Interest free funds is available with the assessee.
C.I.T. Bombay Vs Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K.Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Conclusion: AO was directed while determining sugarcane purchase price paid to the cane growers by the assessee-society to take into account the manner in which the business works, the modalities and manner in which SAP/additional purchase price/final price were decided and to determine what amount […]
SFIO Vs Rahul Modi (Supreme Court of India) 1. Leave granted. 2. These Appeals challenge the correctness of the common interim order dated 20.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Crl.) Nos.3842 and 3843 of 2018. 3. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies […]
Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd Vs Devasis Rudra (Supreme Court of India) In terms of the agreement, the date for handing over possession was 31 December 2008, with a grace period of six months. Even in 2011, when the buyer filed a consumer complaint, he was ready and willing to accept possession. It would […]
CIT Vs Ms Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court) The short question, which arises for consideration in this appeal, is whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the Income Tax Department on the ground that it has rendered infructuous. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant (Income Tax […]
